REVOLUTIONARY LOEHR

To understand Greg Loehr, you must realize he’s not so much a human as a ball of energy. He’s a whirlwind of ideas, opinions, hair, and if overly excited—spittle. He exclaims, pontificates, pauses, and exclaims again. And he’ll laugh at every pointed statement, good or bad. But that scattered image is merely the leading edge—the swirling eyewall of an extremely focused individual who cares about little more than surfing’s progression.
 
Loehr has a history of conflict with the ruling class: ditching third period to sneak into the high school library, being swept up in the shortboard revolution, and his mid-’70s rants against the California conspiracy. For decades, the 52-year-old former East Coast Champion and Hawaiian standout honed his mad scientist appeal alongside his surfing and shaping skills. In 1981, he discovered the cause he’d soon become most identified with: epoxy surfboards. The discovery was the product of a two-decade crusade for better designs and more environmentally safe materials. Twenty years later, Loehr’s company, Resin Research, continues to investigate every possible application and remains responsible for most of the current technology. Even those who disagree with Greg’s theories still admit—or even tout—that he’s one of the few shapers with enough brilliance to blaze his own trails.
 
Unfortunately, Loehr’s one of the epoxy movement’s lone disciples, perhaps because much of his approach involves attacking the powers that be, from manufacturers to surfboards to the dealers themselves. In fact, for every supporter he has, there’s ten more hardliners hoping that, with time, this free thinker from Florida will hang himself on his unorthodox ideals—or at least his volatile defense of them. But Loehr harbors no nasty dreams of bringing the industry to its knees or tailoring surfing to a single approach. In fact, he wants to see the sport open up, revitalize, grow, and spawn a new renaissance era like the early ‘70s where no hardfast rules existed. For him, surfing’s no easy-to-package lifestyle—it’s a constantly changing creative process of discovery and rediscovery. And it’s a due process worth fighting for.
 
ESM: Do you consider yourself a product of the late ‘60s and early ‘70s when everything was socially crazy?

GL: Oh, very much. In ‘67 or ‘68, change was going on all around us. The Vietnam War, music, surfboards—everything was revolutionary. And during that time—right around ‘65—they started building the jetty at Sebastian. Suddenly, when it was waist-high and mushy in Cocoa Beach, it would be a foot overhead and tubin’ at the Inlet. I believe in revolution. I don’t believe in slow change. When I grew up, it was okay to be different; it was almost better to be different. Whereas today, the sport is so stagnant. Look at today’s surfboard: it basically hasn’t changed for 20 years.
 
ESM: When you say that, who do you see as being the enemy in all this stuff?

GL: A lot of it’s just the mentality of people building boards. I think a lot of the best people designing surfboards today don’t have their focus on the boards. There’s not a real desire to create. I read on Swell.com’s shaper forum where they’re talking about blank selection. And to me, it’s like, “Gosh, guys, don’t you want to create anything on your own?” If I use this blank, all I have to do is take a pass of each side and turn the rails—it’s paint by number shaping. Do you think DaVinci was sitting there going, “Today, I’m gonna paint the Mona Lisa. Let’s see, what canvas has it already sketched out with little numbers on it?” It’s bullshit. And because shaping’s become like that over the last 20 years—there isn’t much creativity. I think the shortboard is really off the mark now.
 
ESM: How so?

GL: It’s a surfboard for professionals. And people are getting ripped off. Because, unless you’re a very above-average surfer, you’re going to be frustrated, not catch any waves, and sit there neck-deep in the water. This sport needs an oversized driver or an oversized tennis racket for the recreational surfer. The funboard sort of fills that role, but you go to surf shops and there’ll be 20 longboards, 100 shortboards, and half-a-dozen funboards. The dealers, by what they supply, really force everybody down to where it hurts the sport. There needs to be awareness in shops that a 180-pound guy who buys a 6’4” chip squashtail isn’t going to enjoy it. He’s going to quit, you’re going to lose a customer, and you’ll never see him again. That’s another thing—the shops’ salespeople have so little board knowledge. Every shop needs to hire a pro. Like a golf pro, or a tennis pro: he fixes surfboards, and he’s knowledgeable. The shops need to become pro shops and not just boutiques with surfboards.
 
ESM: Wow. Now that we’ve got you started, can you describe the path of your career before you were a surfing activist?

GL: I started out surfing 16th Street as a kid with guys like Mike Tabeling, Bruce Valluzi, Mike Shay, and Fletcher Sharpe. So I got to see awesome talent, and that’s what I aspired to. I eventually ended up on Tabeling’s Weber team for a few years, then I rode for Oceanside, and I had a Hobie model. I got second in the 1971 East Coast Championships, beating all my heros like Tabeling and Valluzzi—that was the first Hatteras championships, which Charlie Baldwin won—then I finally won in 1974. I only surfed about two or three contests a year. I mean, guys do it every weekend now. But back then, I only had to go out in a heat to qualify for the East Coast Championships. Then I’d go to the US Championships and was usually invited to one or two Hawaiian contests, and that was it for the entire year.
 
ESM: You could still maintain a career doing that stuff?

GL: I built boards. There was no money—no clothing money, no surfboard money. The guys before me were making 20 grand a year, which in the ‘60s was like “phew!” Sam Gornto, who wasn’t even one of the top guys, was getting $300 a week—more money than his dad who was an engineer at the Cape. Tabeling had a Shelby Cobra, Claudie had a Porsche, Valluzzi had a Porsche, the Sharpe brothers both had Vettes. That’s how much money the surfboard industry had at the time. But then, 1969 hit, the surfboard industry ate it, and there was no clothing industry yet. I had a model by Hobie, and I was getting $25 a week [laughs].
 
ESM: Even without the cash, was there still that sense of being a surf star?

GL: Absolutely. They were still putting out magazines, and I was in plenty of those. In California by 1973, there wasn’t anybody out there, except for Purpus, who was even competitive with us back here. There were 10 guys at the Inlet who were better than anyone in California.
 
ESM: Who were those 10 guys?

GL: [sighs] Fletcher Sharpe, Dick Pollack, Jeff Crawford, Mike Tabeling, Jim Cartlin, Regis Jupinko, Lewis Graves, Claudie Codgen, Roger Kincaid, and me [laughs]. On the west coast, there were only two guys who we even worried about: One was Tony Staples, and the other was Chris O’Rourke. Of course, this was still considered the surf ghetto. There couldn’t possibly be any talent on this part of the map.
 
ESM: Do you think part of the reason there was so little East Coast understanding is there was so little coverage?

GL: Mags started using Larry Pope’s photos first. That was the first real quality that ever came out of here. Before that it was a bunch of black and white pictures of guys who couldn’t surf. Then Pope came along, we discovered the Inlet, and suddenly there’s a place with a peak that throws out, with blue water, that you could shoot from all angles—it was like a studio. I mean, Sebastian Inlet—regardless of what any East Coaster thinks of it—was, and still is, the place that put us on the map, and that’s partially because it’s photogenic. It’s also partially due to the people who developed their surfing skills there. Without Sebastian Inlet, believe me, we’d still be the whipped little brother.
 
ESM: So Pope’s photos and the discovery of the Inlet really opened things up for the East Coast?

GL: Pope’s photos were huge. I went to Hawaii the first year and guys like Rory Russell are walking up to me saying, “I saw those pictures of you. God, you guys got great waves!” Yeah, right [laughs]. And the fact that Tabeling surfed as good as he did, and Claudie, then with Crawford and my presence, and onward to Charlie Kuhn and Wes Laine—we chipped away at that prejudice. And it took 20 years until Kelly Slater came along, and it’s like, ‘Okay, maybe you guys can surf’ [laughs].“
 
ESM: Well, there’s a lack of awareness. And a lack of
interest. But, in all fairness, how much do East Coast guys really care about what goes on in California?

GL: That’s true. But there is an interest in what’s going on out there. And there’s a lot of things that developed out here that Californians actually took credit for.
 
ESM: Such as?

GL: The chip surfboard. That was developed here in the mid-’80s—that’s Bill Hartley’s thing. He was the one who pushed the width down under 19”—he and Mike Notary. Bill brought it all the way down to 17 1/2”, and he was who started putting concaves in the boards. Well, actually, I got that one from Brewer. And when Bill started going real
narrow, he wanted more drive in the boards, so we started putting more concaves in ‘em. When he went to Australia, and Greg Webber saw his board at Angourie—and saw Bill surf it—he was the one who popularized concaves on tour. Thin boards too. Hartley was the one who pushed it below two-and-a-half inches. And when Kelly was developing, of course Hartley was one of his heros, and Kechele shaped Kelly’s boards like Bill’s. Slater took those to Al Merrick, and the rest is history... but the shape is really an
Inlet creation.
 
ESM: You mentioned Hawaii earlier. Did you shape with Brewer over there?

GL: I rode Owl’s boards, which were Brewers. And I rode my own boards over there in later years. I built boards in my garage from when I was in high school until I started working for Catri in late 1972. From hot coats and fin boxes, through laminating and glossing—I’ve done all the jobs. I started shaping for Natural Art in 1974, and I worked for them for a long time. The influences were of course, Brewer and Owl in Hawaii, Terry Martin in California, and Joey Thomas when he was here. Those were the main guys.

ESM: How’d you end up starting Resin Research?

GL: I started Resin Research in 1981 while working for Fox in Palm Beach. Epoxy came through windsurfing. The first time I stepped on a windsurfer made of epoxy I couldn’t believe the difference. So I built a surfbooard, and I got the same feeling I got as I did going from a thirty-pound longboard to a fifteen-pound shortboard. This thing weighs nothing, it’s light, more responsive, and more fun. At that time, there were certainly disadvantages to
building and caring for epoxy boards, but the advantage of the way they rode was unbelievable.
 
ESM: Obviously, you’ve made great strides in solving those problems, but when you say “epoxy”, most people still won’t buy it. Do you think you’re still recovering from those initial setbacks?

GL: You’ll eventually buy it. See me now, or see me later, but you’re going to see me someday because this is the way surfboards will be made in the future. Polyester resin just isn’t going to continue. There are environmental laws on the books right now that outlaw it, but they’re not enforcing them yet. Eventually, people are going to want the freedom polystyrene foam gives. For example, two years ago, Doc Lausch came out with a flat-deck surfboard. Now that board rides better than most high-performance boards today, and pretty much everyone knows that. Yet Clark Foam won’t make those blanks because they’re a little more difficult to pour. Just cut the blanks out of big blocks, make a rocker template, and I can shape it this afternoon.
 
ESM: There are some people concerned that pop-outs will eliminate the need for your average shaper ...

GL: Hey, the average guy putting a planer to the foam is about five years away from being history. There’s going to be machines that cut foam exactly to shape that are going to cost $50,000—about what a good shaper will cost you for a year’s work. And when that happens—and it will—then the machine will take the place of the ghost shaper. So, any kid who thinks they’re gonna be a surfboard manufacturer, don’t quit your day job because the traditional surfboard industry isn’t going to be around much longer.
 
ESM: So what’s the human element going to be? Is it just going to be the few guys who’ve built a reputation and have designs and templates?

GL: That’s what it’s going to be. The Pat Rawsons are going to be cutting record albums basically. Shapes are going to be passed around on CD or DVD. And there’s always going to be innovators. But the innovator may be working in front of a computer screen. There’s already CAD programs for designing and testing boats and airplanes.
 
ESM: You mentioned Clark earlier. Do you see him as your ultimate nemesis?

GL: I see him trying to control the industry, and he’s been successful to an extent. Like with the Doc Lausch thing. I can see his point-of-view, but I see a lot of freedom in what I do. And I feel as a designer, freedom is what it’s
all about.
 
ESM: Is there anyone else in the industry who you actually admire?

GL: Clyde Beatty. He’s one of the original guys to bring epoxy here to the United States from Europe. And he’s still making them in Santa Barbara. But otherwise, it’s so stagnant now that it’s hard to really admire anyone. I mean, Rusty put out the C-5, which is kind of a neat idea, and it has some hydrodynamic elements that make it really cool. But he’s been beating this dead horse for six or seven years. Let’s have some more creativity here. Every year, Detroit puts out new cars, because if they didn’t, nobody would ever buy a new one. So, a good portion of the buying market purchases something new because they want a new feel. I’m not going to buy a 6-foot, chippy squashtail every fucking year of my life, because I’m going to get the same feel from every single one. You know, the market wants us to broaden our horizons, and there needs to be more creativity. Do I respect anybody right now? Nobody’s really doing anything that I respect.
 
ESM: You realize that somebody’s going to read this interview and be like, “Who’s this fucker think he is, calling out Rusty, Grubby, Merrick?”

GL: Look at how stagnant the sport is. These are the leaders, and I’m one as well. I’m busting my ass, and have been for twenty years. I’m trying to provide something different, whether it’s right or wrong, or whether you agree with me or not, it’s different. There’s a great JFK quote, “Only those who dare to fail greatly, ever succeed greatly.” So if you want to make something that’s really different, go ahead. They’re just surfboards. If they don’t work, nobody dies. It’s not like a plane or something.
 
ESM: You’re given a time machine but can only travel in one direction. Do you take what you know now to the past, or do you wait and see what’s waiting for you in the future?

GL: You always move forward. I mean, if I took Kelly Slater’s latest chip board in a time machine and handed it to Greg Loehr in 1970, I couldn’t even have stood up on the thing. Because surfing advances in the water, and that’s what changes the boards—the guys in the water. One example I like to use is this guy in Hawaii whose nickname was Helicopter. All he did was 360’s—like six, eight, or ten, on one wave. And he did ‘em real nice, right in the hook. It was cool, and he was real good at it. So let’s say the sport had evolved differently. Let’s just say Helicopter had all of a sudden become “the man” and won all these contests, and that had become the acceptable way to surf. Then what would surfboards look like today? What would surfing look like today? And, shit, maybe it all would’ve happened
anyway. But the fact is, he was there, it did happen.
 
ESM: Is that what you do, look at surfing’s past and imagine all the possible branches and go back and investigate them periodically?

GL: Certainly, because it’s fun. I mean, if you’re not, you’re missing out on one of the great experiences of surfing. Surfing offers so much. It offers travel and riding a lot of
different waves which are just different feelings. It has to offer different surfboards, and different fin shapes. You can either buy a plane ticket and go surf some place, or if you don’t have the time or the money, maybe you just go buy another fin. Or maybe you go buy a new surfboard and get a new feeling. I mean, that’s all this is about anyway, right? And so, if you’re bored with it, you need to explore
something new, whether it’s a new spot, a new board, or a new fin.
 
ESM: Or a new idea...

GL: Or a new idea. And we don’t do enough of that in boards. We’re allowing it to be stagnant, and those of us who are leaders, we need to branch out. We need to give people more than what we’ve given them. I love what I make, I love how I do it, and there’s no way I would ever change—unless something else better came along [laughs]. Matt Walker/Surfing.

Interview
BACK ISSUES
#63 / #64 / #65 / #66 / #67 / #68 / #69 / #70 / #71 / #74 / #75 / #78 / #82 / #83 / #84 / #85 / #86 / #87 / #88 / #89 / #90 / #93 / #94 / #95 / #97 / #98 / #99 / #100 / #101 / #102 / #103 / #104 / #105 / #106 / #108 / #109 / #110 / #111 / #112 / #113 / #114 / #115 / #116 / #117